The GLC and how they Nearly Destroyed Covent Garden

Covent Garden in 1974. By Clive Boursnell

Covent Garden in 1974. By Clive Boursnell

The London premiere for the film of My Fair Lady took place at the Warner cinema in Leicester Square on 21 January 1965. It couldn’t have been anything less than a glamorous occasion – Audrey Hepburn, Cecil Beaton, Rex Harrison (who came with Vivien Leigh) and even Jack Warner himself attended the show. The cinema was only a few hundred yards from Covent Garden, a location featured in the film (albeit a Hollywood studio-version) and which in the mid-sixties was still a functioning wholesale fruit, vegetable and flower market. A market that had been trading officially for almost 300 years ever since the Duke of Bedford in 1670 acquired from Charles II a charter allowing a fruit and vegetable market to take place every day except Sundays and Christmas day.

The ‘greatest ever musical’, as Pathé described the film, and of course Shaw’s original Pygmalion from which it derived, purposely used an Edwardian Covent Garden to show the contrast of rich and poor Londoners rubbing shoulders in what was then a very poor area of inner-city London. Over half a century later in the sixties and seventies Covent Garden, as a place to live and work, was still a very run-down and shabby part of the West End, difficult as it is to imagine these days.

33 Neal Street in 1969. Ellen Keeley’s family emigrated from Ireland during the potato famine and had been making and renting out barrows for the Covent Garden traders since 1830. The firm also ran a florist and a boxing gym.

Covent Garden’s flower market from around 1970

Presumably most of the councillors of the recently-formed Greater London Council, which had replaced the smaller London County Council the previous year, went to see My Fair Lady – after all it was a very popular film. Just two months after the film’s premiere, however, the new Labour-run GLC published the Greater London Development Plan part of which proposed, astonishingly, but as was the wont in those days, that over two-thirds of the historic Covent Garden area should be razed to the ground.

Covent Garden in Edwardian times.

In his book The Changing Life of London, the late George Gardiner, a former journalist and Tory MP who with Norman Tebbit and Airey Neave would end up playing an important role in the election of Margaret Thatcher as Conservative Party leader (not that she could have thought much of Gardiner as he was offered not one ministerial or front-bench position while she was leader of the Conservative party), put across his view of the Covent Garden Development Scheme:

Any loss of nerve on this by the GLC in face of protest from a small section of London’s populace… when the opportunity has presented itself, will do down as a black day in London’s history. If the drift of population away from the centre is combined with a retreat from a policy of comprehensive redevelopment in favour of mere site development it is the next generation of Londoners who will be the losers and who will look back on our timid age with scorn.

Covent Garden market had essentially been nationalised in 1961 by the Conservative government when they created the Covent Garden Market Authority. Soon after there was a plan to move the overflowing market to Nine Elms in Battersea. In 1965/6, mindful that the fruit and vegetable market would soon be gone from the West End, three councils, the Labour-controlled GLC, the Tory-run City of Westminster and the Labour-run Borough of Camden, together with Bovis, the Prudential Assurance company and Taylor Woodrow worked together on the Covent Garden scheme. All of the parties were interested in just one thing – a totally comprehensive redevelopment of the 96 acres that made up the historic Covent Garden area.

Gardiner wrote that when the initial draft plans was presented to the public “more than 3,500 people attended, and in fact, most of their comments wore favourable”. The suggestions from the public that weren’t so favourable, however,  were taken on board and a revised plan was approved by the GLC in 1970. What had changed, however, was that the three London councils, the GLC, Westminster and even Camden were now all Tory-controlled.

An A to Z map of Covent Garden from the 1960s. The GLC plan would mean that two thirds of the area between Shaftesbury Avenue, Holborn, Kingsway and the Strand would be demolished.

The Covent Garden redevelopment plan in 1968.

Covent Garden in 1955

The Covent Garden redevelopment scheme covered 96 acres in an area bounded by the Strand, Aldwych, High Holborn, Shaftesbury Avenue and Charing Cross Road and it proposed the large-scale demolition of the great majority of the 18th and 19th century buildings around the historic old market.

Gardiner, after rather excitedly describing the Covent Garden scheme as Central London’s biggest and most exciting redevelopment project since the Great Fire, wrote of the first phase of the plans which were originally intended to be built by 1975:

There would be three new schools in place of the two old ones, open recreational spaces and new shopping facilities, new hotels, and something London at present does not possess at all – an international conference centre. It would also include a new covered road, running roughly along the line of Maiden Lane, parallel with the Strand, carrying eastbound traffic while the Strand is made one-way westwards.

Horrifically, the international conference centre was designed to completely enclose Covent Garden’s famous Piazza – the Italian-style arcaded square built by Inigo Jones in the 1630s and which was commissioned by the fourth Earl of Bedford to encourage wealthy Londoners to move, to what was then, a semi-rural area. It has been said that Inigo Jones’ new and exciting designs for Covent Garden made it, as far as London was concerned, the birthplace of modern town planning.

The Covent Garden redevelopment model. 1970.

North Spine of the redevelopment, circa 1970.

The solid line are new roads or widened roads. The dotted lines would have been major underground roads while the shaded area was planned to be an open space that would have waved goodbye to Long Acre. Just the road network planned for Covent Garden would have destroyed so much of the Covent Garden we know today.

Meanwhile the second phase, planned for completion by 1980, involved the areas from Maiden Lane down to the Strand. The main feature of which was a new upper level pedestrian street that would link Trafalgar Square and Leicester Square with the Conference Centre. Beneath the raised walkway a brand new main road would run from Charing Cross Road to the Aldwych.

The third phase involved the area north of the piazza, sorry I mean the International Conference Centre, and would consist mostly of new housing, much of it built above smaller offices, the new schools, and other community facilities. In the same area, and as was the fad in those days, another concrete upper-level pedestrian street would run from east to west beneath which an internal service road linked to car parks was planned. At Cambridge Circus there would be a new recreation centre, with a swimming pool and squash courts and an office building one and a half times the size of Centre Point (infamously empty at the time with the developer, Harry Hyams, reported to be happy making money from the rising value of the property rather than letting it out).

Covered pedestrian areas would lead to shops, existing theatres, restaurants and pubs, and over at the northern end of Drury Lane there would be a group of pedestrian squares at different levels, surrounded by shops and flats. This third phase of developments were were conceived to be completed by 1985.

Protest organised by the Covent Garden Community Association in 1972.

In April 1971 a Covent Garden Community Association was formed to provide a unified protest from the local residents and small businesses affected by the radical redevelopment plans. By the time of the local inquiry into the plan in July 1971, Camden Borough Council, which by now had changed from Conservative to Labour control also became formal objectors to the plan it had helped work up three and five years previously.

On the 26th June Anthony Crosland, MP for Grimsby, and the shadow Environment minister made a passionate and influential speech in the commons attacking the damage to London made by the post-war developers:

I believe with passion that it is now time to call a halt. It is time to stop this piecemeal hacking away at our city. It is time to say to the GLC, to Westminster City Council, to Land Securities Investment Trust, to Town and City Properties, to the lot of them, “Gentlemen, we’ve had enough. We, the people of London, now propose to decide for ourselves what sort of city we want to live in.

He added:

If the minister takes the opposite view and allows these plans to go ahead, a very dangerous mood will develop amongst Londoners. There already is a mood of helpless resentment at the inability to stop these damned developments, and this may develop into a mood of active resentment. People will not have London continuously mutilated in this way for the sake of property development and the private motorist. They will not have an endless number of Centre Points and an endless number of uniform, monolithic, comprehensive redevelopments which break up communities and destroy the historic character of the city.

1970. Lady Dartmouth, later Raine Spencer and step mother of Princess Diana, with her son Rupert Legge, at a polling station during the 1970 general election. She would later say about the Covent Garden plans: “I have felt  increasingly that our proposals are out of date and out of tune with public opinion.”

Desmond Plummer, the Conservative leader of the GLC, being shown the Covent Garden plans in 1972. The GLC would become Labour controlled the following year. It’s said because of their opposition to the new roads planned in the West End and all over London.

To the horror of many people who lived and worked in Covent Garden it initially looked like the GLC had won the redevelopment war when in July 1972 the plans were completely upheld by the inquiry inspector in his recommendation to the Conservative Secretary of State for the Environment Geoffrey Rippon.

Within a few weeks, however, the conservationist-minded Lady Dartmouth (who would later marry the Earl of Spencer and become the step-mother of Princess Diana) resigned from her post as chairwoman of the joint local authority committee who had been over-seeing the redevelopment plans. She had been affected by angry protesters who had at one point besieged her house and in her resignation letter she explained:

The theory of organising the sites so that offices, hotels and shops pay for housing, a park and a leisure centre is well-meaning; but no individual or bodies who represent the general public have supported us, and I have felt  increasingly that our proposals are out of date and out of tune with public opinion, which fears that the area will become a faceless, concrete jungle…I am unable to work for a project in which I no longer believe, and which could do unnecessary  and irreparable damage to an historic part of London.

The post-war consensus of modernising cities like London with the bull-dozer approach to redevelopment and traffic circulation was starting to fall apart. In January 1973, nearly eight years after the Covent Garden Redevelopment plan was originally made public and six months after the inquiry inspector had recommended the latest version, Geoffrey Rippon, while ostensibly approving the plan, effectively killed it. He had added 250 buildings to the list of those already protected because of historical and architectural merit which made comprehensive redevelopment in the Covent Garden area almost impossible.

A porter using his head to help carry flowers at Covent Garden market, London around 1970.

In 1961 number 23 Cecil Court was the scene of a murder when the body of part time shop assistant Mrs. Elsie May Batten was found in the rear of the antique shop. An eighteen-inch antique dagger was protruding from her chest.The shop’s owner, Louis Meier, remembered a young man who had shown an interest in a particular dress sword and some daggers in his shop the previous day. The sword was now missing.It turned up in a gun shop on the opposite side of the court, where the son of the owner told police that a man had brought it into his shop that morning. Using these witness’s descriptions the police complied England’s first Identikit picture and released it to the media.On 8th March 1961 PC Cole, who was on duty in Old Compton Street, recognised 21 year old Edwin Bush as being the face on the picture and arrested him. Bush was subsequently hanged for the murder.

Covent Garden in 1974. Photograph by Dave Flett.

Covent Garden in 1955.

Covent Garden in 1974. Photograph by Sean Hickin.

In 1973 the GLC was recaptured by Labour and the new council told the developers and planners that they had to completely start again. Eventually the Covent Garden Community Association would have most of its demands met and nine out of ten of the key sites marked for demolition were saved in the final plans published in 1976.

Anthony Crosland, formerly the shadow Environment secretary, with his wife Susan in 1977. Five days before he died.

Anthony Crosland MP who had made such a fine speech about London post-war development back in 1972 had written a book called ‘The Conservative Enemy’ ten years previously. In it he presciently summed up what had happened, and would happen, to so many city centres around the country:

Excited by speculative gain, the property developers furiously rebuild the urban centres with unplanned and æsthetically tawdry office blocks; so our cities become the just objects of world-wide pity and ridicule for their architectural mediocrity, commercial vulgarity, and lack of civic or historic pride.

In 1974 the Covent Garden fruit and vegetable market moved to Nine Elms in Battersea two years later than planned.

11th November 1974: The old Covent Garden fruit, vegetable and flower market lies deserted at its Covent Garden site

The 1938 version of Pygmalion

The Nags Head, Covent Garden in the early 70s

The picture above comes from a book called Old Covent Garden by Clive Boursnell. You can buy it here.

Brian Protheroe – Pinball

Share

Tags: , , ,

16 Responses to “The GLC and how they Nearly Destroyed Covent Garden”

  1. davyh says:

    I first read about this in Roy Porter’s fab book about London. It beggars belief really, doesn’t it? That part of London could have ended up looking like downtown Birmingham circa 1970.

    From my extensive research (i.e. a quick Google-noodle) I believe 33 Neal St is now a Pepe’s Jeans.

  2. Paul Pensom says:

    Thanks. Excellent post as ever. Two germane points spring to mind. Firstly there is excellent and extensive use of the old market in its last days made by Hitchcock in Frenzy (1972). Apparently Hitchcock’s father worked on the market in the 1930s so it was a familiar spot for him. Here’s a clip:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRfbuQgJsjY

    Secondly, regarding the wider point of post war development, if you’ve not read it I recommend you seek out The Rape Of Britain, written by Dan Cruikshank and Colin Amery in 1975. It’s an angry book; essentially a compendium of the damage done to Britain’s towns by ruthless councils and unscrupulous property developers. The book was supposedly highly influential in helping to sway public opinion. Here’s the unfortunately sparse Amazon link:

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/Rape-Britain-Colin-Amery/dp/0236309439/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1336129369&sr=8-1

  3. Ruth says:

    The quote from Crosland’s book applies just as fully today. And perhaps the much-maligned Raine Spencer can be viewed more sympathetically in light of her willingness to listen to local opinion & change her mind?

  4. John Hobson says:

    Walking through the Covent Garden area last weekend I was telling my kids how it nearly became a motorway. Hard to believe.

    Yet walking along Long Acre for the first time in years, I hardly recognised it. In many ways, like it or not, a lot of area now resembles the infamous plans in its bland appearance.

  5. nickelinthemachine says:

    I know exactly what you mean John. I was thinking exactly that when I was looking at all the old photographs. Although I expect if the plans had gone through the whole place would have had to be redeveloped a second time.

  6. Nicholas says:

    As a horticultural student in 1970 our course went on a visit to the market to track the marketing progress of the mushrooms and cut flowers we grew at the college. I remember the atmosphere of the place, a bit scary actually, and naturally being students getting an early pint of beer in at one of the pubs. Sadly the college while still in operation no longer has the commercial glasshouse range or runs the course.

  7. nickelinthemachine says:

    Have you seen Hitchcock’s Frenzy? It seems a scary place in the film.

  8. Louis says:

    Hi, I am an architecture student from London met. I am currently doing a project on the Covent Garden redevelopment plan, and have been trying to find drawings. I see you have done some in depth research and wanted to find out what the references are for the following drawings:

    “The Covent Garden redevelopment plan in 1968.”
    “The Covent Garden redevelopment model. 1970.”
    “North Spine of the redevelopment, circa 1970.”
    and “The Greater London Council” map.

    This would be much appreciated, as I am building a 3d model of the redevelopment plan for an animated research project.

  9. as always m8..top-end…even the lies are true..well done _

  10. thomash93 says:

    I don’t suppose you know the precise location of the photo labelled ’11th November 1974: The old Covent Garden fruit, vegetable and flower market lies deserted at its Covent Garden site’?

    The artist Edward Bawden made at least three prints of covent garden, one of which is referred to as the flower market and shows what is now the transport museum, one is called the floral hall and I assume is located where the name suggests but the third is referred to as the foreign fruit market and shows the the market in the photo.

    Having visited present day Covent Garden I can’t seem to located this site with it’s distinctive triangular roof, do you know if it was torn down?

  11. john pullen says:

    Very interesting article. We rented 62 Neal Street for 25 years as our offices for H.G Wolsey. Some barrows were stored opposite our offices. We were next to a barbers (Cypriot Andrew), The street was lively and noisy with barrows and lorries loading and unloading. Our building was 4 floors including a basement which we used for stores. At our peak we had 40 staff including office staff. When the redevelopment was announced. The GLC bought our building from under us – we’d been there 25 years as tenants and we weren’t even offered the option to buy. We eventually moved south of the river to Camberwell. My daughter remembers Newmans chocolate shop in Neals Yard and the café in Shaftesbury avenue (Italian) and café 5 doors down. She used to walk from Neal Street along oxford street to Regent Street to do our banking.

  12. [...] are many reasons to cherish Covent Garden, not least of which is that it exists at all. The area nearly didn’t make it past 1973, when it was scheduled for ‘redevelopment’ after the fruit and veg market moved out. The GLC [...]

  13. KentonSchwepps says:

    Terrific piece. Was Betjeman involved in the opposition to this philistine scheme? And less importantly – any idea what most of the traders are drinking in the photo from the Nag’s Head. Looks a bit like tea out of wine glasses with all those milk bottles around?

  14. Vicky Lloyd says:

    I actually live in Covent Garden. Have done for 10 years and was thoroughly shocked at seeing what the proposals were for the market. I know how greedy Westminster council is and I feel they have no heart or soul if they had gone through with it. The beautiful buildings and history of the place. Don’t forget that a lot of tourists come to London for these reasons. Would so many be coming now, if Covent Garden looked like 1 giant concrete car park? I don’t think so!! Thank God the greedy, insensitive people lost. Long live Covent Garden for hundreds of years to come.

  15. If you want an alternative to the conservation project to save Covent Garden, try Brian’s Anson’s “I’ll Fight You for It! : Behind the Struggle for Covent Garden” (ISBN 13: 9780224017954) Anson recounts his experience as former GLC planner, his rebellion and work in the working-class community’s doomed attempt to preserve their way of life.
    Incredibly rare and expensive if you wanted to buy it, but the British Library have a copy.

Leave a Reply